- Yes, I think so. While rendering background pixels, the palette index that gets looked up is simply 0<exp_in3><exp_in2><exp_in1><exp_in0>. -Ulfalizer (talk) 03:58, 2 July 2013 (MDT)
- Interestingly, it looks like the background palette hack wouldn't work for output to the EXT pins though (bit 6 of $2000 set). The logic that causes the VRAM address to be used for the palette index while the background palette hack is active comes after the logic that outputs the index to the EXT pins. -Ulfalizer (talk) 04:15, 2 July 2013 (MDT)
- 1 Source of palette
- 2 Parsing the palette
- 3 Browser compatibility of Drag's palette generator
- 4 Palette color format?
- 5 Platte display
- 6 Move the palette chart to the top
- 7 "classic EGA palette"
- 8 Wow, awing journal layout! How tenacious score you been streaming a journal for? you act blogging seem wanton. The boilersuit bounce of your website is magnificent, as sprucely as the accumulation!
Source of palette
- Screenshot from Nestopia running blargg's full_colors and nes_ntsc. Feel free to bikeshed. —Lidnariq (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2013 (MST)
Parsing the palette
The palette values from this table are read from left to right, then up -> down. Is this ok?
- Almost. They appear to go from $00 to $0D, then the next line from $10 to $1D, etc. --Tepples (talk) 06:42, 28 December 2013 (MST)
Browser compatibility of Drag's palette generator
It appears that Firefox 29 implements built-in validation for
<input type="number"> such that said elements are expected by default to contain integers. This affects the default hue and saturation settings, causing the boxes to be given glowing red borders and explanatory tooltips, and preventing the values from being changed to other reasonable non-integers. The default settings still work (in that they produce the same palette as in older versions of Firefox) as long as they are not changed.
Relevant documentation can be found on various Mozilla websites (not bothering to link any of it here due to lack of login). --22.214.171.124 22:30, 18 May 2014 (MDT)
- Maybe send this information to Drag? I don't think it does much good here. - Rainwarrior (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2014 (MDT)
- How does Drag prefer to be contacted? I am not active on the forums (and therefore don't qualify for an account on the wiki either). The homepage of the domain on which the generator is hosted mentions that Drag has a Twitter account, but I'm not a registered Twitter user either (and I don't feel like registering just for this one issue).
- I don't see how posting here is useless given that some other user could make a fixed version. For example, Tepples has some webspace which could theoretically be used for this. --126.96.36.199 14:46, 20 May 2014 (MDT)
- You used to need a reputation on the BBS or IRC to qualify for a wiki account. You don't anymore; that ended 20 months ago with the transition away from Parodius. Feel free to register and jump right into the talk pages, and so long as your posts there show clue, you'll get autoconfirmed in no time. --Tepples (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2014 (MDT)
- I'll take this into account if I decide to poke at my palette generator again. :P Thanks for letting me know about it though. --Drag (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2014 (MDT)
- The number fields should now be fixed, I hope. I just needed to add a "step" property to the input field to specify that I expect decimals to 0.001 precision. --Drag (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2014 (MDT)
One more problem with the validation: Press the "Get current preset" button with everything else left at defaults. The Wx value of 0.3127 gets flagged as invalid because it has one more decimal place than the current validation allows. It's probably a good idea to allow four decimal places in all the custom colorimetry settings, based on the conventions I've seen. (I suppose I'm fine downloading a copy to run locally if you don't want to bother)
(Aside: My main reason not for registering at this point is lack of HTTPS support. Even if I were to ignore that, I'm a little confused why some accounts have needed to be confirmed manually recently.) --188.8.131.52 14:32, 21 April 2015 (MDT)
Palette color format?
- Those are RGB333 values, so 637 means 6/7 red (0xDB), 3/7 green (0x6D), and 7/7 blue (0xFF). --Quietust (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2014 (MDT)
Why does this page show strange, nonstandard palettes first ?
One version of the canonical, standard NES palette should appear at the top of the page. Other palettes used by RGB, playchoice or whathever are annecdotical and should only appear below. They should most certainly *not* appear first. Bregalad (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2016 (MST)
Move the palette chart to the top
I don't know about you guys, but most of the time I visit this page is because I want to see a chart which maps NES colors to their corresponding numbers. Strangely, the only chart on the page for this is found at the very bottom! The charts that come before it are for the 2C03, 2C04, 2C05 PPUs, not the 2C02 PPU which is what most people would expect.
Suggested change: Move savtool's NES palette to the top of the page, above any mention of the 2C03.
"classic EGA palette"
"These NES colors approximate colors in the classic Windows or EGA palette, though the NES doesn't really have a good yellow" Is this sentence supposed to refer to the chromas prior to or those following it? Myask (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2017 (MST)
- The values before the statement you quoted aren't specific colors. They're values like $x2 and $x4 which represent entire "columns" of colors. For example, $x2 = $02, $12, $22, and $32. $x4 = $04, $14, $24, and $34. Also, the statement you quoted ends with a colon, indicating it refers to the values that follow it. --Bavi H (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2017 (MST)
- It refers to those that follow. I added a section break between the chroma list and the EGA list to clarify. --Tepples (talk) 12:36, 13 January 2017 (MST)
Wow, awing journal layout! How tenacious score you been streaming a journal for? you act blogging seem wanton. The boilersuit bounce of your website is magnificent, as sprucely as the accumulation!
Everything is really rough with a explain elucidation of the issues. It was definitely exemplifying. Your computer is utilizable. Thank you for intercourse